minimind/docs/code-agent.md

Code Generation Agent

This extension adds an execution-feedback loop for Python algorithm generation while keeping the original MiniMind model and checkpoint format unchanged.

Architecture

flowchart LR
    A[Algorithm task] --> B[MiniMind or OpenAI-compatible model]
    B --> C[Python code extraction]
    C --> D[AST policy validation]
    D --> E[Isolated subprocess]
    E --> F[Deterministic tests]
    F --> G[Structured feedback]
    G -->|repair prompt| B
    F --> H[Verifiable reward]
    H --> I[GRPO or CISPO]
    F --> J[pass@k and error metrics]

The implementation is split into small, testable modules:

• code_agent/verifier.py: code extraction, AST policy checks, subprocess execution, timeout and structured results.
• code_agent/reward.py: transparent reward components and grouped GRPO scoring.
• code_agent/agent.py: generate-execute-feedback-repair loop with hidden-test-safe feedback.
• code_agent/evaluation.py: compile rate, execution rate, test pass rate, error counts and unbiased pass@k.
• code_agent/dataset.py: JSONL code tasks adapted to the MiniMind chat template.
• code_agent/backends.py: OpenAI-compatible inference adapter for MiniMind, vLLM and SGLang.

Task format

Each JSONL record contains a prompt, a required function name, and JSON-serializable tests:

{"task_id":"add-two","prompt":"Implement add(a, b).","entry_point":"add","tests":[{"args":[1,2],"expected":3}]}

dataset/code_rl_mini.jsonl contains four smoke-test tasks. It is deliberately too small for a meaningful training claim; use it to validate the pipeline before preparing a larger train/validation/test split.

Evaluate saved candidates

python scripts/eval_codegen.py \
  --tasks dataset/code_rl_mini.jsonl \
  --predictions tests/fixtures/code_rl_predictions.jsonl \
  --ks 1 2

The report separates:

• compile_rate: candidate passed syntax and policy validation;
• execution_rate: candidate completed without a timeout or runtime exception;
• test_pass_rate: fraction of deterministic tests passed;
• pass@k: probability that at least one of k sampled candidates is correct;
• status_counts: syntax, policy, timeout, runtime and wrong-answer failure modes.

Run the repair agent

Start the repository's OpenAI-compatible service, then run:

python scripts/run_code_agent.py \
  --tasks dataset/code_rl_mini.jsonl \
  --base-url http://localhost:8998/v1 \
  --model minimind \
  --max-attempts 3

Hidden-test details are not sent back to the model by default. Add --reveal-test-details only for public development tests.

Train with verifiable rewards

From the repository root:

cd trainer
python train_grpo.py \
  --reward_type code \
  --data_path ../dataset/code_rl_mini.jsonl \
  --num_generations 6 \
  --loss_type grpo \
  --from_weight full_sft

The training log includes degenerate_group_rate. A group whose candidates all receive the same reward has zero normalized advantage and contributes no useful policy-gradient signal. This metric makes the failure mode visible before introducing strategies such as dynamic sampling or harder tasks.

Reward design

The default reward is intentionally transparent and bounded to [-1, 1]:

Outcome	Reward
all tests passed	1.0
wrong answer	partial credit from test pass rate
runtime error	-0.4
timeout	-0.6
syntax error	-0.8
missing code or policy violation	-1.0

Keep hidden tests separate from the prompts and report reward distributions by task difficulty. Otherwise the system can overfit public tests or produce groups with all-identical rewards.

Safety boundary

The local verifier uses AST checks, a temporary working directory, an isolated Python process, a timeout, and POSIX resource limits. These are defense-in-depth measures, not a secure sandbox. Run hostile or externally submitted code inside a dedicated container or micro-VM with network disabled, a read-only filesystem, strict CPU/memory/process limits, and disposable credentials.

Experimental protocol

Use the same held-out tasks and sampling parameters for three comparisons:

1. single-pass generation baseline;
2. inference-time execution feedback and repair;
3. execution-reward GRPO/CISPO followed by the same inference procedure.

Record pass@1, pass@k, test pass rate, compile rate, timeout rate, average attempts, average generation length, reward mean/std, KL to the reference model, and degenerate-group rate. Model results should only be added to the resume after this protocol has been run on AutoDL and the raw logs are retained.

Attribution

This repository is a derivative of jingyaogong/minimind under Apache-2.0. The extension preserves upstream model names and checkpoint compatibility; presentation-layer identity prompts are kept neutral.